COMPANY — WHY LITTVIEW EXISTS
By researchers, for researchers.
LITTVIEW INC. · QUEBEC, CANADA · FOUNDED 2025
THE MISSION
Make rigorous systematic reviews accessible to every researcher — the whole workflow in one place, with AI that shows its reasoning.
IN SHORT — MAKE THE RIGOROUS WAY THE EASY WAY.
Systematic reviews are supposed to be rigorous.
Too often, the tooling isn’t — reviewers stitch together spreadsheets, shared documents, and a reference manager, and the process itself becomes a source of error.
Littview began in frustration with that gap: tools that stopped at screening, AI bolted onto workflows designed before it, AI without the rigor of team review — or platforms so heavy that running them became a project of its own.
So we built the missing one: one workflow, one source of truth — team rigor end to end, AI in its DNA, assistance that shows its reasoning instead of hiding it.
THE OPERATING TERMS
CONDUCT OVER CREDENTIALS- DESIGNED BY
- RESEARCHERS, FOR RESEARCHERS
- OWNERSHIP
- INDEPENDENT — NO INVESTORS
- FREE PLAN
- $0 FOREVER — NO TRIAL CLOCK, NO CREDIT CARD
- PRICING
- ONE PLAN COVERS THE WHOLE PROJECT — NEVER PER SEAT
- YOUR DATA
- EXPORT OR DELETE ANYTIME — NEVER USED TO TRAIN AI MODELS
- THE AI
- REASONING SHOWN ON EVERY SUGGESTION — SWITCHES OFF PER REVIEWER
THE RECORD
FACTS ONLY- COMPANY
- LITTVIEW INC.
- FOUNDED
- 2025
- BASED
- QUEBEC, CANADA
THE VALUES
HELD IN THE PRODUCTRIGOR OVER HYPE
We’d rather be useful than impressive.
WHERE IT SHOWS — THE CAPABILITY SHEET LISTS NOTHING UNSHIPPED: NO PREVIEWS, NO BETA FLAGS, NO PROMISES
YOU DECIDE
AI assists — it never replaces judgment.
WHERE IT SHOWS — EVERY SUGGESTION CARRIES ITS REASONING · AI SWITCHES OFF PER REVIEWER · THE FINAL CALL STAYS YOURS
BUILT FOR REAL SCALE
Tested against 5,000+ paper projects, not demos.
WHERE IT SHOWS — PAGES STAY FAST WHEN THE CORPUS DOESN’T · 5,000 PAPERS AND FIVE REVIEWERS IS THE TEST BED, NOT THE CEILING
QUESTIONS · PILOTS · INSTITUTIONS
Talk to the people who built it.
For institutional pilots, security questions, or anything the docs don’t answer — the inbox is read by a person, not a funnel.